Opinion

Gun violence hits home

Editor:

Once more we have a gun massacre, this time in Newtown, Conn., and once more we hear calls for gun control.

Well, the sad truth is gun controls won’t work, any more than the much-ballyhooed “war on drugs” will work, and any loner, loser, or lunatic who wants to get his hands on a gun will do so one way or another.

And let’s not kid ourselves that this is an American disease. Go to Google and look up Hungerford, England (1987), Port Arthur, Australia (1996), our own Ecole Polytechnique, Montreal (1989), Dunblane, Scotland (1996) when an entire kindergarten class was slaughtered, and, most recently, Utoya, Norway (2011).

Somehow, as a society, we are going to have to de-romanticize the glory of the gun; we are going to have to convince young men – and yes, the shooters were all young men – that a gun does not make you more of a man.

Until that happens, alas, there will be yet more Columbines, more Dunblanes, more Newtowns.

Jim Armstrong, Surrey

• • •

With gun violence appearing to be on the increase in the U.S., America has yet to wake up to its libertarian availability of guns, including military assault weapons to anyone.

Whereas in Canada, regardless of our gun registries, we have for some time restricted and even prohibited various weapons through our Criminal Code.

It appears, however, that Liberal leadership candidate Marc Garneau is less than informed, especially given there is already considerable restriction – and in some cases bans – in Canada on assault-type rifles.

Canadian gun laws are far more strict than those of the U.S., as are our penalties.

It would be helpful if Garneau were to target the source of gun issues, which should include psychological evaluations of potential owners and users prior to licensing, rather than worrying about the type of weapon on the market.

It’s not the machine that kills, it’s the person behind it.

We allow raving nut cases to drive cars and trucks without special vetting, and there’s no ban on automobiles, which can cause far more destruction and loss of life that an already somewhat controlled firearm, regardless of what it may look like.

Let’s count the number of car owners versus guns, not to mention repeat offenders racing about on motorized weaponry, and bring our risk categories into clear context.

James Cooper, Surrey

 

 

We encourage an open exchange of ideas on this story's topic, but we ask you to follow our guidelines for respecting community standards. Personal attacks, inappropriate language, and off-topic comments may be removed, and comment privileges revoked, per our Terms of Use. Please see our FAQ if you have questions or concerns about using Facebook to comment.

You might like ...

Mueller to appear on Poker After Dark
 
Miller has 31 saves, Canucks beat Blues 4-1
 
Five Mariners set for wrestling provincials
Fraser Health scales down mobile flu shot clinics
 
Icy 16 Avenue closed after dump truck crash
 
Election 2014: Election debate turns to sprawl
Smitten by the Mitten
 
Local Hoop Rivals Go Up
 
Maple Ridge super senior still pumping iron at 97

Community Events, October 2014

Add an Event

Read the latest eEdition

Browse the print edition page by page, including stories and ads.

Oct 23 edition online now. Browse the archives.