Opinion

EDITORIAL: A timely response

Apathy in the political process has reached an all-time high in recent years, with the perception that elected representatives are not really listening to public concerns.

But there is evidence this week that the provincial government is heeding public feedback, on two currently contentious issues at least.

An all-party committee of MLAs has unanimously supported a proposal from Finance Minister Mike de Jong that henceforth all B.C. politicians will publish their expense receipts – including food, travel and accommodation – online.

The proposal, clearly a response to the flap over legislature Speaker Linda Reid’s expenses – including nearly $5,500 in business-class air travel for her spouse, since repaid – elicited a few grumbles from NDP MLAs over the work involved in backing all expenses with receipts.

But it seems MLAs overall agreed with de Jong’s assessment that steps need to be taken to restore public trust, after recent “unreasonable” expense abuses in B.C. and beyond.

Meanwhile Agriculture Minister Norm Letnick has apparently taken note of written feedback from B.C. residents in amending the proposed Bill 24, which would make changes to the province’s Agricultural Land Reserve.

The contentious two-zone provision remains, dividing ALR land into one area (Metro Vancouver, Vancouver Island and the Okanagan) where farmland would be protected from non-agricultural development and another (essentially the rest of B.C.) where farmers might have options to invite in ‘value-added’ industries that could include oil and gas development.

But there are indications that the impassioned words of many regarding both the need for food security in the province and a long-term commitment to preserving agricultural land have been noted and reflected in amendments.

The amended legislation has received guarded endorsement from the B.C. Agriculture Council, although NDP agriculture critic Nicholas Simons says Bill 24 is still probably the worst piece of legislation he has seen.

The actual impact of both of these provincial policies remains to be seen, of course.

Politicians generally are past-masters in the art of simulated action, and manipulating public opinion through carefully stage-managed response.

But the BC Liberals have everything to gain and nothing to lose by demonstrating a greater level of responsiveness to public opinion – rather than the predictable chorus of partisan support.

We encourage an open exchange of ideas on this story's topic, but we ask you to follow our guidelines for respecting community standards. Personal attacks, inappropriate language, and off-topic comments may be removed, and comment privileges revoked, per our Terms of Use. Please see our FAQ if you have questions or concerns about using Facebook to comment.

You might like ...

Police seek Surrey taxi robbery suspect
 
Election 2014: South Surrey ‘family group’ targets pro-gay policy
 
Fog, navigation methods blamed for container ship grounding in Fraser River
Conservatives cagey about extending combat
 
Boxing bell joins Chuvalo in Hall of Fame
 
Avoid future chaos outside schools, council tells staff
UPDATE: Parliament Hill shootings too close to home for MPs, staff
 
LIVE STREAM: TEDx conference in Vancouver; Past highlights on Travel, Learning, and Gossip
 
Trustee candidates talk about education in Mission

Community Events, October 2014

Add an Event

Read the latest eEdition

Browse the print edition page by page, including stories and ads.

Oct 23 edition online now. Browse the archives.