Editor:
Re: Businesses, residents plagued by squatters, Oct. 26.
Tom Fletcher’s angry, extended sneer against homeless people puts forward a few skewed or unjustifiable claims.
First, Fletcher suggests that tent cities tend to be features of the “soft-politics urban regions” of B.C. as if they are unique here. This is not true as conditions of poverty see “tent camps” springing up in every province as people have few or no other options. The politics that support housing as an investment rather than a human right are hardly “soft-politics.” They have quite harsh outcomes.
Second, Fletcher waves the standard stigmatizing banners of “do[ing] anything but work to support their bad habits.” Many of what Fletcher himself calls the “new generation of street people” are in fact working formal jobs. It could also be added that living on the streets is itself hard work, as is maintaining a camp site. The generalization about bad habits is purely the language of stigma (how many housed people have “bad habits?).
Fourth, Fletcher makes a distinction between “residents” and homeless people or “squatters.” This is false. The homeless living in our neighbourhoods are also residents. Making such a false distinction is a way of dividing neighbourhoods along lines of class, property, and ownership, and nothing more.
Finally, Fletcher offers a few anecdotes from his acceptable “residents” but says nothing about the fact that some residents in Nanaimo, who pose themselves as respectable citizens, have aligned themselves with the neo-fascist Soldiers of Odin to confront people living at the tent city. That is where anti-homeless rhetoric can lead.
Contrary to Fletcher, this resident has had enough of poverty, homelessness, social deprivation and the forces of accumulation, development, speculation and policing that sustain them. I welcome any homeless person in my neighbourhood – as a neighbour.
Dr. Jeff Shantz, Department of Criminology, Kwantlen Polytechnic University, Surrey