Letters to the Editor

City should be camera shy


Re: White Rock eyes waterfront cameras, June 14.

Some may think that the issues of cameras is important, but it has to be well-reasoned and based on far more tangible facts at hand.

To think that we will be the first without hefty opposition in the courts and matching legal bills we would be foolish.

This item is considered by many as the thin edge of the wedge, if you will, and both mayor and council are on a very slippery slope on this issue.

This seemingly small issue is going to lead us down a very perilous road that we will take at our own risk and expense.

We might be creating an environment that is unwelcome to those who might wish to visit our city, and with the absence of better reasoning, we risk further harm to our local small business community as well.

Ron Eves, White Rock


We encourage an open exchange of ideas on this story's topic, but we ask you to follow our guidelines for respecting community standards. Personal attacks, inappropriate language, and off-topic comments may be removed, and comment privileges revoked, per our Terms of Use. Please see our FAQ if you have questions or concerns about using Facebook to comment.

You might like ...

Surrey murder victim identifed as Jaylen Sandhu, 17
Williams Park lights will go on Thursday
Surrey RCMP officer to stand trial on multiple gun charges
COLUMN: Some advice to Kinder Morgan from the mushy middle
Hunters protest shift favouring non-residents
Australian woman charged with murder of 8 children
Report suggests radical solution to navy woes
Food scraps to be banned from garbage cans Jan. 1
High-flying Malm leading the way for Hawks

Community Events, December 2014

Add an Event

Read the latest eEdition

Browse the print edition page by page, including stories and ads.

Dec 18 edition online now. Browse the archives.