Letters to the Editor

Silent safety on the track

Editor:

Re: Silencing train whistles to cost $1.8m, Jan. 28.

Just a layman proposal:

Have a lead vehicle, purpose-built and light, running at some safe distance ahead of the train while passing through residential areas.

Should any danger lie ahead, the operator on the lead vehicle would alert the train operator to slow down or prepare to stop the train.

The lead vehicle may need to have rubber wheels capable of bringing itself to a complete stop over short distance in case of an emergency. And the minimum lead distance would be the braking distance of the train plus a safety margin.

When not in use, the lead vehicle would be attached to the front of the locomotive.

With this measure, whistle blowing can be done away with.

Fen Kong Liew, Surrey

 

 

We encourage an open exchange of ideas on this story's topic, but we ask you to follow our guidelines for respecting community standards. Personal attacks, inappropriate language, and off-topic comments may be removed, and comment privileges revoked, per our Terms of Use. Please see our FAQ if you have questions or concerns about using Facebook to comment.

You might like ...

UBC scientist says chinook salmon may be wiped out
 
LETTERS: Not all trees able to stand alone
 
LETTERS: Honouring lives through our art
LETTERS: Don’t fence White Rock in
 
LETTERS: Our cities need to protect trees
 
Pedestrian dies crossing South Surrey highway
Search for answers in South Surrey homicides continues
 
Initial assessment finds mother unfit to stand trial: defence
 
7-year-old girl buried, killed in Lions Bay rockslide

Community Events, December 2014

Add an Event


Read the latest eEdition

Browse the print edition page by page, including stories and ads.

Dec 18 edition online now. Browse the archives.