Letters to the Editor

Silent safety on the track


Re: Silencing train whistles to cost $1.8m, Jan. 28.

Just a layman proposal:

Have a lead vehicle, purpose-built and light, running at some safe distance ahead of the train while passing through residential areas.

Should any danger lie ahead, the operator on the lead vehicle would alert the train operator to slow down or prepare to stop the train.

The lead vehicle may need to have rubber wheels capable of bringing itself to a complete stop over short distance in case of an emergency. And the minimum lead distance would be the braking distance of the train plus a safety margin.

When not in use, the lead vehicle would be attached to the front of the locomotive.

With this measure, whistle blowing can be done away with.

Fen Kong Liew, Surrey



We encourage an open exchange of ideas on this story's topic, but we ask you to follow our guidelines for respecting community standards. Personal attacks, inappropriate language, and off-topic comments may be removed, and comment privileges revoked, per our Terms of Use. Please see our FAQ if you have questions or concerns about using Facebook to comment.

You might like ...

Casino/crime correlation queried
Dismal democracy demonstration
Peace Arch News Classic volleyball tournament to hit court
Our New West adventure
Advocate for animal protection – and for the unborn
Thanks for Halloween parade cooperation

Community Events, October 2014

Add an Event

Read the latest eEdition

Browse the print edition page by page, including stories and ads.

Oct 23 edition online now. Browse the archives.