Letters to the Editor

Silent safety on the track

Editor:

Re: Silencing train whistles to cost $1.8m, Jan. 28.

Just a layman proposal:

Have a lead vehicle, purpose-built and light, running at some safe distance ahead of the train while passing through residential areas.

Should any danger lie ahead, the operator on the lead vehicle would alert the train operator to slow down or prepare to stop the train.

The lead vehicle may need to have rubber wheels capable of bringing itself to a complete stop over short distance in case of an emergency. And the minimum lead distance would be the braking distance of the train plus a safety margin.

When not in use, the lead vehicle would be attached to the front of the locomotive.

With this measure, whistle blowing can be done away with.

Fen Kong Liew, Surrey

 

 

We encourage an open exchange of ideas on this story's topic, but we ask you to follow our guidelines for respecting community standards. Personal attacks, inappropriate language, and off-topic comments may be removed, and comment privileges revoked, per our Terms of Use. Please see our FAQ if you have questions or concerns about using Facebook to comment.

You might like ...

Clooney, Cuaron, and Toronto should inspire Vancouver Film Festival
 
‘Iconic’ White Rock artist to be featured in calendar
 
Mapping out future by perusing the past
Local boy nominated for a Joey
 
50-year mystery of missing dino bones solved
 
Former South Surrey agent’s arrest makes international headlines
Whiteley takes public accolades with a grain of salt
 
Harrison Festival winding up
 
Elevating dance in Surrey

Community Events, October 2014

Add an Event

Read the latest eEdition

Browse the print edition page by page, including stories and ads.

Oct 21 edition online now. Browse the archives.