Letters to the Editor

LETTERS: More to spring break than money

A focus on financial savings is the wrong way to value an extended spring break, says letter-writer K. Johnson. Above, teacher Carolyn Logan-Estey and her students at Crescent Park Annex. - File
A focus on financial savings is the wrong way to value an extended spring break, says letter-writer K. Johnson. Above, teacher Carolyn Logan-Estey and her students at Crescent Park Annex.
— image credit: File

Editor:

Re: Two-week break to stay, March 27.

$1.43 per pupil per day? Is that really how much we saved?

Your article reported, “The extra spring break days add up to a savings of at least $500,000 for the school district.”

That might be impressive until we see that the Surrey Schools website states that “more than 70,000 students returned to school on Sept. 3, 2013”.

That works out to a savings of $1.43 per student for each of the five days of the extended break.

The extended spring break is a wonderful break for our students and our teachers, but let’s not allow its value to be based on its purported savings.

K. Johnson, Surrey

 

 

We encourage an open exchange of ideas on this story's topic, but we ask you to follow our guidelines for respecting community standards. Personal attacks, inappropriate language, and off-topic comments may be removed, and comment privileges revoked, per our Terms of Use. Please see our FAQ if you have questions or concerns about using Facebook to comment.

Community Events, July 2014

Add an Event

Read the latest eEdition

Browse the print edition page by page, including stories and ads.

Jul 24 edition online now. Browse the archives.