Letters to the Editor

LETTERS: Loss of trees in perspective

Editor:

The infill development section of Surrey’s Official Community Plan calls for the retention of “existing trees and natural and heritage features in existing neighbourhoods, where possible, in order to preserve neighbourhood character and ecology.”

Drive through South Surrey and see for yourself the pitifully small number of trees that are retained in the high-density developments currently under construction.

When hurricane-force winds blew 10,000 trees down in Stanley Park, it was a catastrophe.

In 2013, when Surrey First city councillors approved developments that recommended 8,564 mature protected trees for removal, it was business as usual.

Gary Cameron, Surrey

 

 

We encourage an open exchange of ideas on this story's topic, but we ask you to follow our guidelines for respecting community standards. Personal attacks, inappropriate language, and off-topic comments may be removed, and comment privileges revoked, per our Terms of Use. Please see our FAQ if you have questions or concerns about using Facebook to comment.

You might like ...

LETTERS: Rail fencing won’t make us safer
 
LETTERS: Don’t fence White Rock in
 
LETTERS: Our cities need to protect trees
Penticton family flying over random act of kindness
 
B.C. to announce Peace River dam decision
 
Police still looking for Port Coquitlam woman missing since July
Growing pains for police investigation unit
 
Food scraps to be banned from garbage cans Jan. 1
 
Small plane makes desperate landing at Pitt Meadows airport

Community Events, December 2014

Add an Event


Read the latest eEdition

Browse the print edition page by page, including stories and ads.

Dec 18 edition online now. Browse the archives.