City obliged to maintain value

Editor:

Re: Personal gains not the priority, May 27 letters.

For those who propose governance in an equitable manner, I assume you propose we all pay the same tax rate, that our homes are all assessed equally regardless of market value.

Editor:

Re: Personal gains not the priority, May 27 letters.

For those who propose governance in an equitable manner, I assume you propose we all pay the same tax rate, that our homes are all assessed equally regardless of market value.

Should the dumpy shack off the lane pay the same revenue to the city as the view home on the bluff?

Or, do you mean ‘equitable’ only when it suits you?

Municipalities assess property taxes based on many criteria, only one of which is view. There can be upwards of millions of dollars difference between two properties identical in every way, other than view quality. When there is a quantifiable value set on an asset, and when a private citizen stands to lose an asset’s value because it can’t be maintained through no fault of their own, the municipality has an obligation to maintain that value.

One alternative is to remove that view’s value from the equation. No city is going to do that and thereby reduce their tax base.

But they cannot have it both ways.

Litigations will ensue if the tree policy is deemed unreasonable. The city will lose; you will foot the bill.

If one was to believe the flawed, out-of-context math applied by letter-writer S. Watkins– “A single tree can have a 61 per cent rain interception rate, providing $25,000 to $35,000 to our (Storm Water Management) plan” – why have we not all floated away on the record-breaking rainfall this spring? There is far more development and less tree canopy now than in past years, when hillside ravines washed out.

Perhaps Watkins would like to be more specific on what tree species and what calliper would be capable of such numbers. Should the hillside have massive species of western red cedar and Douglas fir tucked between the houses?

About as ludicrous a suggestion as the touted facts that prompted it.

In the May 27 news article, Tree policy needs clarification: committee,  environmental committee chair Wilma Boyd emphasizes: “It needs to be clear that any healthy tree on city property will be staff’s and only staff’s choice as to how that tree is going to be dealt with.”

If that is a fair statement, substitute the words “city” for “private,” and “staff’s” for “homeowner’s.”

It might surprise those who regularly march on city hall that not everyone wants increased government regulations and interference in their private lives.

There are too many self-appointed gatekeepers these days, too keen on dictating how others should live: the hippie who comes to the protest in the exhaust-spewing van; the young mother who douses her home with anti-bacterial sprays, then shops organic-only; the environmentalists who chain themselves to trees for the sake of media coverage.

There are so many more-worldly causes worth fighting for other than whether your neighbour wants trees removed. Focus on industry and agriculture practices, for a start.

Can you not see the bigger picture?

Mother Nature is a resilient b—-! She has far more capacity for renewal than given credit for. Those of us who have devoted much of our lives to her, who put our knowledge into action, are simply fed up.

The best we can do is mind our business, with hopes others do the same.

P. Tyler, Surrey

 

Get local stories you won't find anywhere else right to your inbox.
Sign up here

Just Posted

Construction underway for new Cloverdale elementary school

The $33 million school is to seat 655 students

George Garrett retires from Volunteer Cancer Drivers Society board

Society completes more than 58,000 trips since 2016

B.C. families financially affected by pandemic eligible for grocery gift cards

Program open to struggling families in Lower Mainland and Fraser Valley communities

Two Surrey schools report COVID-19 exposures, including second contact for Panorama Ridge

Fraser Health has created a new webpage listing COVID-19 cases in schools

B.C. or Ontario? Residential school survivors fight move of court battle

It’s now up to Ontario’s Court of Appeal to sort out the venue question

B.C. transportation minister will not seek re-election

Claire Trevena has held the position since 2017

Young B.C. cancer survivor rides 105-km with Terry Fox’s brother

Jacob Bredenhof and Darrell Fox’s cycling trek raises almost $90,000 for cancer research

VIDEO: Shots fired outside Langley gas station that was scene of 2018 homicide

No reports of injuries in Saturday evening incident

B.C. migrant, undocumented workers rally for permanent residency program

Rally is part of the Amnesty for Undocumented Workers Campaign led by the Migrant Workers Centre

Is it time to start thinking about greener ways to package cannabis?

Packaging suppliers are still figuring eco-friendly and affordable packaging options that fit the mandates of Cannabis Regulations

Preparations underway for pandemic election in Saskatchewan and maybe B.C.

Administrators in B.C. and around the country are also looking to expand voting by mail during the pandemic

Nearly 20 per cent of COVID-19 infections among health-care workers by late July

WHO acknowledged the possibility that COVID-19 might be spread in the air under certain conditions

Ferry riders say lower fares are what’s most needed to improve service

Provincial government announces findings of public engagement process

Most Read