Skip to content

Meagre buffers are not enough

Editor: I am writing regarding the mass development in South Surrey.

Editor:

I am writing regarding the mass development in South Surrey.

Earlier this year, I purchased a townhome in the Rosemary Heights area and was told by the agent seller that the forested area to the east was all protected woodland, as well as an area buffering a stream to the south.

I was aware of a duplicate apartment that was to be built but was told, “You will never have to worry about development beside you, the area is protected.”

I purchased the home only because of the quiet forested area and the fact that, as a shift worker, such an area is integral to being able to function.

Since settling into the home I have come to love the birds, deer, rabbits and other wildlife that come to the fence and can be heard in the forest.

I can’t express to you my shock when developers pulled up in a truck last week and began walking in the forest.

Through my conversation with them and further contact with Surrey City Hall, I learned that the only protected area is the stream to my south and that my neighbouring forest will soon be home to a new townhome development, the access point being the dead end in front of my home.

Aside from the false information provided to me by the sales agents, I am concerned about the habitat for these animals and wonder what thought Surrey puts into maintaining areas for wildlife.

That the city is growing is great, but at what cost?

There is a responsibility to maintain forested areas and habitats and not just pay lip service to it by retaining a meagre ‘buffer’ around a protected stream.

Looks like Surrey is the next concrete jungle.

Lisa Hodgetts, Surrey