Residents express concerns and suggestions for the City of White Rock's Policy 611 – governing tree management on city lands – during a public information meeting Tuesday at city hall.

White Rock views ‘difficult to define’

About three dozen people packed White Rock City Hall chambers Tuesday to voice their opinions and concerns regarding the city's policy for tree management on public lands.

About three dozen people packed White Rock City Hall chambers Tuesday to voice their opinions and concerns regarding the city’s policy for tree management on public lands.

While emotions were tempered, frustration was evident as residents questioned and criticized points ranging from slope stability to the city’s definition of an “established view.”

Rob Thompson, the city’s director of engineering and municipal operations, conceded view is not an easy thing to define.

“It’s in the eye of the beholder, it really is,” Thompson told the crowd. “I struggled with this in developing this policy.”

The meeting was the result of controversy that erupted in January, after trees on city land in the 15100-block of Royal Avenue were removed because they were blocking views. The applicant’s request had initially been denied, but was granted by council on appeal – allowed for in the policy that was approved by council in June 2010.

Removing that avenue for appeal was among several suggestions for change in a revised tree management policy that Thompson presented to council this past July.

Other suggestions included replacing a provision that allows residents to apply for the pruning or removal of any tree on city land with one that allows applications to prune or remove a tree that has grown to obscure an established view; and that applications regarding city trees only be considered from White Rock property owners who have lived at their property for at least two years.

Thompson also suggested that applicants be made to prove a view has become obscured by growth; and, have support of 80 per cent of respondents living within 30 metres of the tree in question.

Receiving public input on all of the revisions was the point of Tuesday’s meeting.

Suggestions from attendees that received wide support were for the policy to be made a bylaw; for violation fines to be higher; and for the time residents have to oppose or support an application to be extended beyond the current two weeks.

The tree policy also needs to deal with those residents who plant on city land without permission, often as a means of extending their own property, said Larry Robinson.

“People planting trees on city land, those trees should not be protected,” Robinson said.

Thompson noted that problem is rampant in White Rock, rooted in a history of people simply being allowed to do what they want with city land. In some areas, homeowners have erected fences on city road allowances, and are benefiting from property they don’t pay taxes on, he said.

“People just take it for granted that it belongs to them, and it doesn’t,” he said.

Doug McGinn, whose application on Royal Avenue sparked the debate earlier this year, said whatever policy results, it needs to consider the views of everyone.

“We have to find a medium here,” he said. “It’s easy to say cut nothing.”

Other suggestions for the tree policy were for it to include private trees as well; that it ensure trees are dealt with at a time of year that won’t further impact their health; and that attached values of trees be “dramatically increased” to reflect “appropriate international standards.”

Two areas of concern that Thompson and city arborist Aelicia Otto said couldn’t be addressed in the city’s policy were that of trees on the waterfront – on BNSF land – and of trees in BC Hydro right-of-ways. The city has no jurisdiction in either case, Otto said.

A second public meeting on the policy is set for 6-8 p.m. Sept. 22 in council chambers, 15322 Buena Vista Ave. Thompson told Peace Arch News comments from both meetings are to be summarized, with proposed revisions expected to be brought back to council in October.

 

 

Get local stories you won't find anywhere else right to your inbox.
Sign up here

Just Posted

Wally Oppal says policing ‘too important’ to be left to the police

Oppal was keynote speaker at a Surrey Board of Trade “Hot Topic Dialogue” breakfast event Wednesday

Surrey skater speeds his way to four golds, a silver at BC Winter Games

‘I just really enjoy going fast on the ice,’ says Barnett Liu, 14

17 medals for Delta athletes at 2020 BC Winter Games

More than 1,000 athletes from across the province competed in Fort St. John Feb. 20-23

‘Urgent’ need for Metro Vancouver homeless count volunteers

Organizers say another 100 people are sought to help in Surrey and Burnaby

VIDEO: Minister says consider coronavirus outbreak when planning for spring break

Foreign Affairs minister points to rash of new cases appearing in places like Italy and Iran

Donations pour in for family who lost father, son in fatal crash on B.C. highway

Mike Cochlin and sons Liam and Quinn were travelling on Highway 5A

Alberta tourist dies after plunge from 70-metre cliff in Stanley Park

The 26-year-old hopped a fence at Prospect Point on fell to a walkway below, police said

B.C. man who pulled a gun on off-duty cop gets two years in prison

Encounter also led police to a home where 100 guns and explosives were found

New Westminster woman’s ‘out of character’ disappearance probed by police

She left without telling anyone, prompting investigation by Major Crimes Unit, police say

EDITORIAL: Fraser Health needs to be transparent to fight coronavirus panic

Fraser Health and other authorities are not helping by being vague in recent communications

Riverdale actress Lili Reinhart rescues puppy from Langley shelter

American actress named her adopted pup Milo

How clean is your favourite local restaurant or café?

Online inspection reports allow consumers to find health hazard of all food facilities in region

Most Read

l -->